|
||||||
|
The Journal of the American Medical Association reported a fatality from
Prolotherapy in 1959. The patient had a history of terrible
low back pain and
sciatica on both sides for 15 years. She
received injections of zinc sulfate in 2.5 percent phenol solution. She
immediately developed some lower extremity paralysis and was
hospitalized. The report states that she regained almost complete use of
her legs within a few days. Apparently some four months after the Prolotherapy she goes to the hospital because of nausea, vomiting and
low back and leg pain. She is taken to the operating room and
exploratory neurosurgery is performed at the base of her head. She had a
marked hypotensive (low blood pressure) episode during the operation and
an adrenaline compound was needed to keep her blood pressure up.
Immediately after the operation her pupils were barely reacting to
light. The author noted that he thought this was due to cerebral anoxia
due to the prolonged period of hypotension during the operation. Several
hours later the patient died. Does this look to you like a patient died
after Prolotherapy? She did not develop the symptoms that led to her
hospitalization, on October 27, 1957, until four months after she
received the Prolotherapy. She obviously died because of the surgical
procedure causing her blood pressure to drop—the author of the article
admits it in the text. The author noted, "An attempt at surgical
correction of this apparently hopeless situation resulted in death. This
technique of precipitating fibro-osseous proliferation [He is talking
about Prolotherapy] appears to be neither sound nor without extreme
danger."
A
similar erroneous conclusion might have been "neurosurgery appears to be
neither sound nor without extreme danger." I would not, of course, say
this because neurosurgery can save lives. However, a case of a
Prolotherapy side effect is reported. The side effect appears to have
resolved within a few days. The person is then admitted to the hospital
four months later and dies during surgery. Because of this, "experts"
considered all Prolotherapy as extremely dangerous. This, of course, is
published in one of the most prestigious medical journals to "warn"
everyone about it.
Another prestigious medical journal, Journal of Neurosurgery, published
a report of three cases of side effects related to Prolotherapy in 1961.
Never did the physicians state what was injected in any of the three
cases. In reality, an improper solution was used. The typical
Prolotherapy solutions was not what was used in these cases. But because
one physician used a different solution, the natural conclusion was that
all Prolotherapy is highly dangerous. The conclusion in this article was
"...it is clear that injection of sclerosing solutions into the region
of the spine is a highly dangerous procedure." Imagine if a totally
incompetent neurosurgeon was performing brain surgery, not following
standard protocols of treatment and people were dying or left paralyzed.
Would it be right for someone to write an article in a medical journal
regarding these cases and then state that neurosurgery is a farce and
extremely dangerous because everyone is going to die or become
paralyzed?
How could
Dr. George Hackett, a great pioneer of Prolotherapy, have a 90
percent cure rate without even one side effect, yet these
other physicians report four cases of people receiving significant side
effects? The answer is easy. The physicians who caused these side
effects did not follow the cardinal rule of Prolotherapy. Do not inject
around the spine unless the needle is touching the bone. Additionally,
they did not use the standard solutions of the day, such as Sylnasol.
The authors of these articles (including the editors of J.A.M.A. and
Journal of Neurosurgery) should have made it extremely clear that
standard Prolotherapy protocol was not followed in each of these cases.
A more reasonable conclusion would have been that all
Prolotherapy doctors
are not created equal. Prolotherapy is a very safe procedure if
standard protocol and solutions are used, but serious side effects are
possible if these are not followed.
SEE ALSO |
||||||
|
Physicians Add Your Listing, Update Your Listing or learn more about Prolotherapy Training |
||||||
|
Getprolo.com cannot guarantee the accuracy of any resources or information from or about the physicians listed on this website. The opinions and statements in this website DO NOT necessarily reflect the opinions of the physician members of the getprolo.com referral network and are those of the article author only. A medical testimonial is intended to represent that everyone will obtain the same favorable results from a given therapy. Getprolo.com disclaims any such intention.
Prolotherapy is a medical
technique. As with any medical technique, results will vary among
individuals.
Prolotherapy may not work for you and as with all medical
procedures there are risks involved. These risks should be discussed with a qualified
health care professional prior to any treatment.
This site is operated by Beulah Land Corporation. |