|
||||||
|
Studies suggest that the prevalence of lower back pain in the adult population of the United States is at least 60% and its incidence, about 30%. Astonishing as it may sound, 10-12% of the population is seeking health care for low back pain at any given moment.
While some forms of back
pain are transient—such as simple bruises caused by
light trauma, which require at most an analgesic
treatment to ease the pain until it heals
naturally,—persistent or chronic lower back pain usually
develops over an extended period of time, due to
interacting causative factors involving the vertebrae
and their supporting tissues. Although these two types
of "extended pain" are similar in many respects,
researchers have distinguished them according to a few
basic guidelines.
Generally, pain is
described as "persistent" if it does not heal promptly,
based on statistical standards; or, if it recurs
regularly, in defiance of any treatments provided.
"Chronic" is the term usually reserved for pain lasting
longer than three months, which, in both cause and
effect, often involves psychological as well as physical
factors, or combinations of the two. As with all types of pain, there are many possible factors causing or contributing to both types of extended lower back pain. The two main causes are spondylosis, or degenerative disk disease, and muscular or ligamentous Inflammation.
The
chronic lower back
pain patient typically experiences some type of trauma
to the lower back that causes injury to the interspinous
and supraspinous ligaments.
This may causes some
forward slippage of the fifth lumbar vertebra onto the
sacrum, which in turn causes excessive pressure on the
vertebra disk. Fissures may occur at the annulus
fibrosis, and this begins the degenerative disk problem. Ligaments are designed to handle a normal amount of stress that will stretch them to their natural limit, and will return to their normal length once the stress is removed. If additional (traumatic) stress is applied— stretching the ligament beyond its natural range of extension—the ligament will not return to its normal length, but will instead remain permanently overstretched, diminishing its power. Such a condition is called Ligament laxity. Ligament laxity in the lower back, as elsewhere in the body, may be caused by a major traumatic injury, repeated minor injuries to the same area, or simple normal aging. Unlike muscle tissue, ligaments have a very limited circulatory system that means a poor supply of blood to replenish them. This is why ligaments do not heal well on their own, and why Prolotherapy is needed in these types of injuries to stimulate circulation and to promote new cell growth.
The sacrum at the base of the spine is the
"keystone" bone, on which all of the most vital structures of the body rest.
Besides the lower vertebrae and the rest of the spinal column that it supports,
it bears the weight of the entire torso with all its major organs. Descriptions and diagnosis of common low back pain include:
Perhaps the most distressing is "failed
back syndrome" -- an official-sounding term to
describe the pain of those poor patients whose surgical attempts have failed to
correct their problem.
The most common cause of failed
back syndrome is poor judgment
on the part of the physician.
Surgery prescribed as a last
resort, with a hope and a prayer
that it might alleviate the
pain. Unfortunately, often times surgery does little to help, and in fact can make things worse. Frequently surgery results in post-operative scarring, which often exacerbates the initial problem or causes new pain syndromes.
Subsequent "corrective" surgery
can help in some cases,
particularly if the damage done
by the first operation involves
clearly observable physical
complications like nerve root
compression, massive scarring,
bone spurring or foraminal
compression.
Unfortunately,
the rate
of
success
for
second
surgical
operations
in the
case of
"failed
back
syndrome"
is no
greater
than it
was for
the
initial
operation,
and
declines
with
further
attempts.
In the
words of
a
surgeon
involved
in such
procedures,
"In our
extensive
experience,
satisfactory
outcome
is
achieved
about
60% of
the
time.
Evidence
indicates
that
many
patients
suffering
from
residual
pain
after
multiple
operations
can
benefit
from an
intensive
rehabilitation
program. Prolotherapy to the Rescue
A study
published
in 1987—by
which
time the
procedures
of
Prolotherapy
were
fairly
well
established—offered
dramatic
support
to
proponents
of the
still
basically
unknown
technique.
In the
first
double-blind
study on
the
effects
of the
treatment,
two
groups
of
carefully
screened
patients—with
at least
a one
year
history
of back
problems
that
hadn't
responded
to other
non-surgical
treatments—were
injected
with
either a
true
prolotherapy
proliferant
(a
dextrose-glycerine-phenol
solution
originally
developed
to treat
varicose
veins),
or with
a
saline-based
placebo. The test subjects had been thoroughly pre-screened, with full clinical evaluations, x-rays and lab tests, and the 82 patients accepted had arrived with painful conditions. 60% were currently using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A half-dozen were experiencing such intense pain that they were taking narcotics for relief. A whopping 91% had difficulty sitting still for any length of time, and 65% had difficulty sleeping due to their pain. 17% had difficulty walking, sexual activity was down in 21%, and 4% were completely bed-ridden.
Six
months
after
the
treatment,
35 of
the 40
people
who'd
received
the
actual
Prolotherapy
treatment
had
experienced
at least
a 50%
reduction
in
pain—a
success
rate of
88%. And
15 of
them
were
completely
pain
free--compared
to only
4 in the
control
group. Other "pain score" indicators backed up the results of this data, confirming the success of the therapy. One thing was eminently clear: Prolotherapy worked for the treatment of chronic low back pain. |
||||||
|
Physicians Add Your Listing, Update Your Listing or learn more about Prolotherapy Training |
||||||
|
Getprolo.com cannot guarantee the accuracy of any resources or information from or about the physicians listed on this website. The opinions and statements in this website DO NOT necessarily reflect the opinions of the physician members of the getprolo.com referral network and are those of the article author only. A medical testimonial is intended to represent that everyone will obtain the same favorable results from a given therapy. Getprolo.com disclaims any such intention.
Prolotherapy is a medical
technique. As with any medical technique, results will vary among
individuals.
Prolotherapy may not work for you and as with all medical
procedures there are risks involved. These risks should be discussed with a qualified
health care professional prior to any treatment.
This site is operated by Beulah Land Corporation. |